Appendix · Pages 54–62
Prompt Library
Copy and adapt these prompts into any AI tool (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot). Text in [brackets] is where you insert your specifics. The full library covers course design, assessment, feedback, and administrative efficiency.
Syllabus Draft Generator (Beginner)
I am designing a [level] course on [TOPIC] for [NUMBER] students at [TYPE OF INSTITUTION]. The course runs [NUMBER] weeks, meeting [FREQUENCY]. Students typically have [prior knowledge] and come from [cultural/linguistic context]. Create a draft syllabus with: a 150-word description, 5–7 measurable learning outcomes using Bloom's Taxonomy, a week-by-week outline, suggested assessments with weightings, and required resources. Prioritize [low-cost/open-access] materials.
AI-Resistant Assessment Designer (Intermediate)
Redesign the following assessment to be more AI-resistant without compromising validity or fairness. Original assessment: [describe]. Learning outcome: [state]. Suggest three modified versions requiring authentic student thinking, how each maintains alignment, the trade-offs, and how to communicate the changes to students.
Structured Feedback Template (Beginner)
I am providing feedback on a [assignment type] by a [level] student. Assignment: [paste]. Rubric criteria: [list]. Score: [grade]. Draft constructive feedback that opens with a specific strength, addresses 2–3 improvements with concrete suggestions, connects to learning outcomes, and closes encouragingly — 150–250 words, culturally sensitive for [regional context].
Policy Document Drafter (Intermediate)
Draft a [departmental/institutional] policy on [AI use in student assessments] for [institution type] in [country/region]. Use clear, non-legalistic language. Include purpose, scope, definitions, permitted and prohibited uses, consequences, and a review schedule. Balance innovation with academic integrity.
PD Workshop Designer (Intermediate)
Design a [NUMBER]-hour professional development workshop for [NUMBER] faculty at [institution type] on [topic]. Participants: [profile, e.g., senior faculty, skeptical but open]. Include 3–4 learning outcomes, a timed session outline, two hands-on activities, a discussion protocol, a take-home resource, facilitator notes for managing resistance, and pre/post survey questions.
Developed by Chanrattnak Mong